Rare Earth Market Needs Competition, Says US Congress

email Email  Print Print  
Mon, Mar 29, 2010
Feature Articles, Rare Earth Articles

By Desmond McMahon–Exclusive to Rare Earth Investing News

us congress LinkedIn Share Over the past two weeks, lawmakers in Washington have debated resurrecting a domestic supply-chain for rare earths and creating a national stockpile of the elements in response to China’s growing monopoly over the minerals.

The Congress’ subcommittee on Science and Technology addressed Rare Earth Minerals and 21st Century Industry, and in his opening statements Chairman Rep. Brad Miller (D-NC) lamented how quickly China has taken over rare earths production.

“The United States, not so long ago, was the world leader in producing and exporting rare earths. Today, China is the world’s leader,” he said.

US domestic production slid dramatically through the early part of the 21st century due to low prices, which some experts attribute to Chinese state-owned production, home-grown environmental concerns;,and less government support, testified Karl Gschneidner, Jr., a senior metallurgist at the US Department of Energy’s Ames Laboratory in Iowa.

Now, the US relies almost entirely on China to supply rare earths despite holding approximately 15 percent of the world’s reserves on US soil.

Dudley Kingsnorth, of the Industrial Minerals Co. of Australia, estimated that by 2015 the world demand for rare earths will total at about 210,000 tons. He expects China will churn out around 170,000 tons, leaving it up to the rest of the world to supply the remainder.

Miller says now is the time to recognize the importance of these minerals and act. He also notes China’s policy on rare earths is changing.

“China appears to view rare earths as one of the incentives they can offer a technology firm scouting for a new plant location. How do we compete in attracting and retaining manufacturing firms that need access to rare earth elements in light of China’s current near monopoly, and their willingness to use their monopoly power to our disadvantage?”

Clearly, the Chinese are no longer content to simply dig up rare earth minerals and export them to those countries who need rare earths for their high-tech manufacturing. So, with China poised to cut back on exports and a potential shortage of the minerals, which are instrumental in developing green technologies and in weapons manufacturing, some US lawmakers are calling it a national security issue.

Miller says, “The most immediate step [to end China’s monopoly] would be to get some competition back into the supply of rare earths.”

But building domestic US competition back into the rare earths market could be a costly venture.  Jim Hedrick, a former USGS rare earth specialist, says no one in the US “wants to be the first to jump into the market because of the cost of building a separation plant,” which would require thousands of stainless steel tanks holding different chemical solutions to separate out all the individual rare earths.

Hedrick estimated that opening just one mine and building a new separation plant might cost anywhere from $500 million to $1 billion and would require a minimum of eight years.

Molycorp Minerals is one of the US-based companies looking to re-establish production of rare earth elements at their San Bernardino County mine and has already begun processing “light” rare earths, such as lanthanum and neodymium, from a stockpile at its mine in Mountain Pass, California. But it still has to ship its rare earths to China for final processing, because only China has the equipment to do the job.

Mark Smith, chief executive for Molycorp Minerals, said the company is on track to produce 20,000 tons of rare earths annually by mid-2012 if they can get all the required funding in place. But Molcycorp was dealt a blow when they were deemed ineligible for a loan guarantee program through the U.S. Energy Department.

On March 17th, Rep. Mike Coffman (D-Colo) introduced The Rare Earth Supply-Chain Technology and Resource Transformation (RESTART) Act of 2010 in the U.S. House of Representatives. It would make Molycorp’s plan eligible for the loan guarantee program, which would allow the company to borrow 70 percent of the $450 million cost, to be paid back over 10 years.

But the bill itself would not authorize any federal funding for any of the proposals. Instead, it asks that the U.S. Departments of Commerce, Energy, Defense and the Interior dig into their own pockets to support the rebuilding of a rare earth supply chain.

The Act is in committee stage and to be reviewed by the subcommittee on House Armed Services, Subcommittee on House Ways and Means, and Subcommittee on House Financial Services before returning to floor to be debated by all the members.

Questions about this article? Leave a comment below or contact our editorial team at editor@resourceinvestingnews.com.

6 Comments on this Article

  1. Aat T. Oskam Says:

    But there is an Australian Company which will be ready to mine and process Rare Earth Elements by the end of 2010: Lynas Corporation (ASX:LYC). So USA: use this Opportunity to lower your Dependancy on China!
    Aat T. Oskam
    The Netherlands

  2. desmond Says:

    Good point. In 2009 China offered to buy 51% of Lynas Corporation but the Australian regulators blocked the deal. Lynas was still raising funds last time I looked.

    But the Chinese take their rare earth dominance seriously and haven’t let the Australian mines go unnoticed. China already owns 25% of Australia-based Arafura Resources (ASX:ARU), who expect to have a rare earths processing plant at its Nolans Project to be in production in 2011.

  3. Aat T. Oskam Says:

    Desmond,

    Lynas has already raised the money (about 450 M Au$) and has appointed the Construction Firm to finish the work that was already done before with the money From the Chinese Firm! Both the Mining Engineering as well as the processing Plant will be operational mid 2011. So they wil start producing (as opposed I sayd in my first reply) mid 2011. See http://www.raremetalsblog.com for more info on Lynas. To be frank, I am a shareholder now since I read that they had raised the money, after I got a Confirmation from Lynas themselves..

  4. Aat T. Oskam Says:

    Link should be
    http://www.raremetalblog.com
    Sorry about that…

  5. Desmond Says:

    Thanks for the link Aat. Good info.

  6. David Says:

    China is trying to buy 51% of Australian Lynas Corporation, (Mt Weld Rare Earths) who are gearing to set up a Malaysian processing plant. Don’t you think that if China holds a controlling interest in this company it could only be used beneficially on their behalf and limit their competition? Why on earth (excuse the pun) would China support the advancement of Mt Weld production when, I would assume, processing of this commodity would be of such less cost out of China than mining in Western Australia then shipping to Malaysia for processing?

    On CNN tonight they spoke about the US being in a bit of a spot with only the capability of producing 17% of Rare Earth out of a California plant. Is not Australia and the US allies? Should they not be looking to purchase investment into the Australian stock and hence creating competition for China?

Leave a Comment

What is Rare Earth Investing News' Comment Policy?
Rare Earth Investing News pre-moderates comments on our blog posts and post-moderates comments on news stories. We never censor comments based on political or ideological point of view. We only delete those comments that include the following transgressions:

  • Are abusive, off-topic, use excessive foul language
  • Include ad hominem attacks including comments that celebrate the death or illness of any person, public figure or otherwise
  • Contain racist, sexist, homophobic and other slurs
  • Are solicitations and/or advertising for personal blogs and websites
  • Thread spamming (you've posted this same comment elsewhere on the site)
  • Are posted with the explicit intention of provoking other commenters or the staff at Rare Earth Investing News
  • Contains content that may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations.
Asides